Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDedeoğlu Demir, Burcuen_US
dc.contributor.authorErol, Özgülen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-16T09:46:54Z
dc.date.available2021-06-16T09:46:54Z
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.citationDemir, B. D., & Erol, O. (2018). Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use among Turkish Cancer Patients and the Influencing Factors. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 11(1), 319–332en_US
dc.identifier.issn1792-037X
dc.identifier.issn1791-5201
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12294/2761
dc.description.abstractBackground: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies especially among cancer patients was quite frequent because of many reasons. Objective: The study was conducted in order to determine the use of CAM therapies among Turkish cancer patients and also determine the influencing factors. Methodology: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was performed with total 280 patients who received inpatient and outpatient treatment in an oncology clinic of a university hospital. Data were collected by using the Patient Characteristics Form and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Scale. p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: This study demonstrated that the patients who were women, and receiving outpatient care used energy approaches more often; patients who were single, and had metastatic disease used CAM approaches more often than the others. No significant difference was found between CAM use and education, occupation, performance score, diagnosis, and time of diagnosis. It was determined that 79.3% of the patients did not ask their physician about the use of CAM, and the knowledge about CAM use was taken from the newspaper/ television (36.1%), and friends (36.1%). Most frequent used approaches were nutritional (taking honey, 67.1%), cognitive behavioral (praying always, 41.1%), and biologic (drinking linden tea, 43.6%). The most common reason of CAM use was found as to strengthen the immune system (43.9%). Conclusion: The use of CAM therapies among Turkish cancer patients was quite frequent. Both health professionals and patients should be informed about the proper use of these approaches.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherEscuela de Administracion y Mercadotecnia del Quindioen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Caring Sciencesen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCancer Patientsen_US
dc.subjectComplementary and Alternative Medicine Approachesen_US
dc.subjectNurseen_US
dc.titleComplementary and Alternative Medicine Use among Turkish Cancer Patients and the Influencing Factorsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentSağlık Bilimleri Yüksekokulu, Hemşirelik Bölümüen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-1836-2897en_US
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage319en_US
dc.identifier.endpage332en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster